The media has worked hard to sweep the story of Danney Williams under the rug.
Williams claims to be the love-child of Bill Clinton.
And now he’s revealed what he claims are the former President’s never-before-known grandchildren.
Williams – who is now 30 years old – has five children.
And he has consistently told them Bill Clinton is their grandfather.
The Daily Mail reports:
“Recently I have been telling my kids that their grandfather was the president of the United States and they’re amazed by it, they’re like “No. Is it for real?” I tell them yes, he is my father and I will make sure you get to meet him one day,’ he says in the video.
He also says that growing up, his family would receive ‘seven $100 bills’ each month by mail, but it all stopped when Clinton became president.
As he speaks, a series of photos featuring Williams and his smiling children flash across the screen.
Williams has long claimed that his prostitute mother met Clinton when she was working on the streets of Little Rock, Arkansas. He claims she told him they had sex 13 times.”
Williams may have brought his children public to ramp up pressure on the media to investigate his claims that the former President is actually his father.
Star Magazine claims to have performed a DNA test in 1999 that demonstrated Clinton is not Williams’ father.
But the accuracy of the test was called into question at the time by Salon, which claimed such a test would be impossible with the information available at the time.
Star’s editor also detailed how they never obtained a blood sample from Clinton and never published a story about a laboratory test.
World Net Daily reports:
“But in an interview Tuesday morning, Bunton told WND that no blood sample was obtained from Clinton and Star Magazine never published a story documenting a laboratory test.
“I don’t remember ever seeing any laboratory test that was done on Clinton’s DNA,” Bunton told WND.
Bunton is now the owner of the Rivertown Magazine in Haverstraw, New York.
He affirmed to WND that the tabloid relied on the DNA evidence for Clinton published by independent counsel Kenneth Starr, extracted from the infamous Monica Lewinsky blue dress.
“We got a lot of phone calls from several people in the media, including the New York Times, wanting to know when we were going to get the DNA back,” Bunton recalled to WND. “We thought it was going to turn out to be his son, but when the DNA came back there was no story there even to write.”
The DNA test released by Kenneth Starr was the second of two DNA laboratory tests the FBI had run on Clinton, but the public record leaves no doubt that Starr withheld the more robust test conducted by the FBI.
The New York Daily News on Jan. 7, 1999, reported that Kenneth Starr had made public only one of two DNA lab analyses and that the results made public came from the less reliable method known as a “polymerase chain reaction” test, or PRC, that experts do not consider sufficiently robust to determine paternity.
Apparently, Starr withheld the more robust test, known as a “refraction fragmented length polymorphism” test, or RFLP. This was the kind of test required to run a side-by-side comparison.”
Will this story continue to haunt the Clintons?
Let us know what you think in the comment section.