Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton shocked the United States when it was revealed she jeopardized national security by using a private email server.
Even after an investigation by the FBI, Clinton still walks free due to an incompetent FBI director and establishment politicians meddling in the judicial system.
But now, courts are being pressured once more to release information about the case–and potentially indict Hillary once and for all.
A federal judge put pressure on the FBI to release critical information pertaining to the case, as a result of a cause of action suit filed by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.
The Daily Caller reported:
A federal judge ordered the FBI Thursday to publicly release previously unseen documents related to the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.
U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the FBI to produce uncensored court documents describing the grand jury subpoenas issued to force Clinton’s internet service providers to turn over information related to her private server use, according to a statement released by Cause of Action Institute.
The ruling was made in response to a motion filed in June as part of a suit brought by Cause of Action Institute and Judicial Watch. The organizations claim the Department of State violated the Federal Records Act by failing to maintain records related to Clinton’s handling of classified information.
In the past, the FBI claimed there was a need to remain secretive about information in the case against Hillary Clinton.
But Judge Boasberg countered that argument by claiming the information was previously released–thus voiding the secrecy of the information.
The Daily Caller continued:
Boasberg justified his ruling on the basis that the set of documents in question “rehashes information already made public, thus obviating any need for secrecy.”
Cause of Action President and CEO John J. Vecchione praised the decision in a statement released Thursday following the court’s ruling.
“I applaud the court’s opinion. The government attempted to end a case with evidence no one could review. This order makes public details submitted by the government about the FBI’s efforts to recover then-Secretary Clinton’s unlawfully removed emails,” he said. “Americans deserve to know the full scope of that investigation, and we, as Plaintiffs, should have an opportunity to contest the relevance of the government’s facts.”
Many blamed former FBI Director James Comey for his lack of action during the case.
During his testimony, he acknowledged Clinton’s acts as being extremely careless–but stopped short of filing charges.
Many believe Comey’s inaction led to Clinton walking free, and as a result, President Trump later fired him.
The Daily Caller continued:
Former FBI Director James Comey called Clinton’s use of a private email address and server to handle classified information “extremely careless” in his July Congressional testimony but stopped short of filing charges.
Do you believe that all information regarding Hillary Clinton’s case should be made public?
Do you think former FBI Director James Comey inhibited the investigation in any way?
Leave us your thoughts in the comments section below.