Here’s Nancy Pelosi’s Latest Smear Campaign Against President Trump

Nancy Pelosi is perhaps one of the most hateful Democrats to currently hold a position in Congress.

Her constant slandering of President Trump consistently lands her in the news — but not in a good way.

Her latest smear campaign against President Trump proves Nancy Pelosi is incapable of fighting for the best interests of this country — and what she said will shock you.

Nancy Pelosi’s Wild Outburst on TV

On MSNBC’s “Am Joy”, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) claimed that President Donald Trump is trying to “Make America White Again.”

Pelosi claimed, “Since I’m on the subject of Dreamers, since last night, the president put forth a plan. Let me just say what I said last night, that plan is a campaign to make America white again. It is a plan that says over 50 percent of the current legal immigration will be cut back. … They are changing the character of our country by what they are putting forth. They bring a tear to the eye of the Statue of Liberty.”

We’re going backward, and the president with all of his statements is the master of the dog whistle. Everything he has done, whether it’s taking babies out of the arms of their moms, whether it’s issues that relate to health care in our country, access to services and the rest is  — his whole thing is ‘Make America White Again.’ That’s his thing. He can say a nice thing today in a tweet, but the fact is his actions speak louder than his words.”

Her outburst on the live show came after President Trump announced his new plan for immigration control.

Outrage–From All Fronts

 Pelosi’s commentary sparked outrage from both sides of the political spectrum.

Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia slammed Nancy Pelosi in return for her ignorant comments geared towards the President.

In an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, Sen. Joe Manchin said, “You know what? We don’t need that type of rhetoric on either side……I’m condemning all this crazy rhetoric that goes on. Just because someone’s a Republican — it’s not my enemy. And we have to work together.”

Manchin later cited that he was “cautiously open” to Trump’s plan, citing that he wished to see more illegal aliens eligible for a path to citizenship that Trump is proposing.

The Immigration Plan that Fueled the Fire

Trump revealed his proposal late last week which would grant a “path to citizenship” to 1.8 million “Dreamers” even if they did not apply for the DACA program.

In return, President Trump is asking for $25 billion dollars to help secure our borders, an end to chain migration, and a cancellation of the diversity lottery policy.

According to a poll conducted by Harvard-Harris, 65% of voters overall agreed with Trump’s desire to end these Obama-era policies.

But Democrats are still furious because the plans would crush their efforts to legalize potentially tens of millions of new illegal aliens, and be forced to choose between aiding the “Dreamers” and pursuing their much broader immigration ambitions.

Republicans are arguing that Democrats are more interested in importing new voters by granting illegals visas rather than pursuing their larger immigration goals.

Do you believe President Trump’s latest immigration plan will succeed with support from the Democratic party?

Do you believe that it is time for Nancy Pelosi to retire from the political scene?

Leave us your thoughts in the comments section below.

  • Richard Wittauer

    Do you believe that it is time for Nancy Pelosi to retire from the political scene? PAST TIME

    • larry herring

      Her father was a big MAFIA guy in Baltimore , so what would u expect from that scrum bag of trash

    • Lawabiding

      I am hoping she sticks around and continues being the face of the democratic party as she emulates who they really are !!!!

    • Betty Anthony

      I am afraid that she will die in office. Retire? Not in most of Congress’ vocabulary. Republicans ( of which I am one) included.

      • RightWriter

        It’s different for a Speaker. Once they’ve BEEN Speaker, nobody wants to go back to being even Minority Leader, never mind an ordinary back-bencher. If Nancy can’t deliver a Dem majority in November, the Dems — who have moved WAY left in the last few years — are NOT going to invite her to be Minority Leader: they’re going to shove her out the door, ass-first if necessary, as fast as they CAN.

        BTW, a RECORD number of House members from BOTH parties have retired or are retiring this year. It goes in cycles: when there’s a big class of one party or the other that all come IN together, it’s often the case that a lot of them will retire in the same year. They serve longer than they could under term limits, but they DO NOT stay forever.

    • RightWriter

      Well, IF the Republicans can hold their majority in the House this November, even if reduced to just a few seats, you can probably expect Nancy to be GONE by January (bequeathing California the cost of holding a special election to fill her seat in February). She doesn’t WANT another term as Minority Leader.

      However, if the Democrats take control of the House this November, Nancy WILL run for Speaker of the House again — and will most likelyu WIN.

      Just ONE MORE REASON WE HAVE TO HANG ON TO THE REPUBLICAN MAJORITY! 🙂

  • frank shea

    The fumes from Pelosi’s brand New Super-Charged Broom that she flies to Frisco on weekends damaged her little cerebellum!!!!
    I had asked her to wear a mask on that long flight but she refused!

    NOW! I fixed the Broom and it is perfect bu I am still working on Nancy’s
    Brain damage. The chemicals I used on the Broom are not working on her!!!!

    She now jumps up and starts to sing like James Brown!!!!
    She believes she is Liver Lips Maxine Waters!!!!

  • Kurt Kruse

    Nancy is the bright shinning festered pimple on the elected Democratic Parties swollen ass. They do nothing but bitch, lie, steal, and misdirect. Their resistance to all things Republican or the executive branch,leave their ass’s swollen as they won’t get off of them, long enough to earn their bloated wages.

  • SouthernPatriot

    Nancy Pelosi, not only imbibes vodka, but also is suffering from advanced stages of Trump Derangement Syndrome which makes her demented. She needs to retire before she expires.

    • Rod

      She actually needs to be fired by some more sensible voters. She is cut from the same yardage as Maxine Waters. Their time is long gone.

      • Betty Anthony

        Let’s try and vote both out this election.

        • Rod

          Yes indeed. Let’s replace them with much more sensible people.

          • RightWriter

            You’ve most likely MISSED your chance! The California primary election (it’s a “jungle primary,” meaning the 2 top vote-getters moved on to the general election, regardless of party) WAS IN JUNE. Hello? Granted, one more Republican vote for either one’s opponent wouldn’t have made much difference.

            Pelosi has TOKEN opposition from a Republican named Lisa Remmer, and (amazingly) Waters has a token Republican opponent named Omar Navarro. I confess I know NOTHING about either of them, but BOTH those districts are SO HEAVILY DEMOCRAT that it’s VERY unlikely either will get more than a handful of votes (that’s why I say “token opponents.”)

            If you really want to try for an upset — to “replace them with much more sensible people” — you should start searching NOW for a REALLY attractive candidate (I don’t mean good-looking; I mean SMART and ELECTABLE.) Start promoting him/her RIGHT AFTER THE 2018 ELECTION. Maybe, if all goes well, you’ll have ELECTABLE candidate(s) in 2020. But you can’t decide to do it in AUGUST of election year and expect ANYTHING good to happen. Politics hasn’t worked that way since the 1950s!

          • Rod

            I agree. I’m still waiting for California to split into 3 different states. Most Californians are tired of the same old BS.

          • RightWriter

            Granted, I speak as a non-Californian, but I am NOT keen on the idea of having SIX Senators from what is now California!!! Very likely 4-5 of them would be ultra-liberal Democrats, and Republicans or conservatives would have that much more work to do to win a Senate majority!

            That’d make it MUCH harder to get even a great President’s choices approved for the Cabinet, and putting conservatives on the Supreme Court (or lower federal courts) would be just about IMPOSSIBLE. And, of course, just getting good bills approved in the Senate would be harder, too.
            And the three Californias would suck up THREE TIMES as much taxpayer money from the other 49 states — without PAYING a dime more in taxes! 🙁

            AND it’d be that way FOREVER, once we’ve got THREE Californias, they’d never agree to become ONE state again!

            So, much as I sympathize with your plight out there in the “Once-Golden State,” I DON’T want your fellow Californians making life WORSE FOR THE REST OF US by becoming even MORE dominant nationally than California is today.

          • Rod

            The problem is, as I see it living in Oregon, they have the same problem in California -the large population areas are very liberal.

          • RightWriter

            That’s true not just in Calif. and/or Oregon, but everywhere. I posted on another board today about how that came about — how city political machines (mostly run by Democrats) were organized originally to help the poor & recent immigrants, and they were NOT run by government. They played an important role at a time when there WERE no big government spending programs, basically just churches and the political party machines.
            Gradually, however, the churches were pushed out (because people began — deliberately — to misinterpret the “separation of church and state” — and the machines took over the city governments. This was a CENTURY ago (during the last era of heavy immigration), but continues today.
            So today’s “large population areas” (aka: cities) — as you note — are very liberal. My objection to your earlier idea of splitting California into 3 states is just that it would EXPAND our federal government by ADDING DEMOCRAT/LIBERAL/ PROGRESSIVE/SOCIALIST Senators and probably members of Congress too. What we DO NOT need in Congress is a whole new source of liberals. 🙁

          • Rod

            That is all true. We need to push harder for term limits in Congress. Maybe that way we remove the incentive for big business to get out of government.

          • RightWriter

            First, term limits really wouldn’t help much because it’s NOT “big business” that we need to worry about. Sure, business has some influence on politicians — but remember, BUSINESSES ARE MADE UP OF PEOPLE — employers. employees, board members AND stockholders. Whom do you WANT running businesses in this country — GOVERNMENT? THAT is socialism.

            Second, term limits really wouldn’t accomplish much in terms of getting big business out of government (or, in my opinion, achieving anything else!). We already HAVE term limits, if people really want to use them: they’re called ELECTIONS. A higher percentage of incumbents are being … involuntarily retired … this year than in any election in the last 30 years, and we still don’t have the list of people who are just going to LOSE in November.

            The reason more incumbents don’t lose is simple: THEIR CONSTITUENTS (the people who can VOTE in those states or districts) LIKE them. Keep in mind that Senators are elected by voters within just ONE state, and House members by voters within relatively small Congressional districts (about 700,000 people, including non-voters like kids). If you live in Oregon you get to vote for Oregon’s senators (or their opponents) and a Congressperson in ONE district out of Oregon’s 5. You DON’T get to vote in Virginia, or Texas, or anywhere else. If a majority of the people in your district — those sufficiently interested to vote at all — LIKE their representatives (just checked: you don’t have a Senate election this year), they’ll get re-elected; if the people DON’T like them, they WON’T. And every registered voter in every other state has the same option to reelect or NOT reelect members they like.

            Also, term limits would lead to a HUGE increase in the number of UNINFORMED or INCOMPETENT legislators — people like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. It takes TIME (and a certain innate brainpower) to master the issues (as Cortez ha NOT), and to learn HOW TO GET THINGS DONE in Congress — it’s not all that easy! By the time a Senator or Congressperson LEARNS how to do it (and forms the ALLIANCES with other members that will make it possible), term limits would be pushing him/her out the door, however much the voters wanted him/her to stay. Sure, advancing from the House to the Senate (that’s not technically an advance, as the two houses are considered equal, but most people see it as a step up) MIGHT save ONE good Congressperson, but ONLY ONE — and only if he/she could win statewide in that year. Not guaranteed. So it’s very likely term limits would be a political DEATH SENTENCE for the members YOU LIKE BEST.

            The other trouble with term limits is that they’d force retirement on the GOOD Senators & Members of the House (the ones you LIKE) as well as the bad ones (the ones you HATE). Let’s say you work really hard to elect someone, and you’re thrilled because in Oregon it’s not EASY to elect a conservative. But then in just a few years — and 6 or 12 years can pass VERY quickly — he/she has to RETIRE. And you can’t find another candidate who’s as good. WHY SHOULD YOU AND YOUR NEIGHBORS LOSE THE EXCELLENT SENATOR (or Congressperson) JUST WHEN THEY’RE GETTING TO KNOW HOW TO GET THINGS DONE?

            As you can see, I’m not a big fan of term limits. The last time we had this debate, back when President Ronald Reagan was saddled with a Dem-controlled House, i said I thought “term limits are a BAD idea whose time had possibly come.” At the time we thought limits could be imposed legislatively. When THAT turned out to be a non-starter (courtesy of Supreme Court), I concluded they’d be a BAD idea whose time SHOULD NEVER COME. We need to work harder to convince voters that OUR policies are RIGHT, and then let the people who KNOW HOW TO LEGISLATE DO THEIR JOB.

        • RightWriter

          Spare yourself the effort, and go volunteer in a more promising district!
          Pelosi’s district is about 80% white & some Asian, and 75-80% Democrat. Waters’s is 95% black or Latino and more like 98% Democrat. Both Pelosi & Waters have been renominated, too (no surprise there).
          Not until 2022 when the new Census takes effect will there be ANY chance of voting either of them out — and even then it’ll be unlikely (all those Democrats will still be in the area, and probably the district lines won’t change very much.)

          BUT…if the Republicans keep control of the House this year, Nancy will probably RETIRE before the new Congress takes its oath in January. She does NOT want to be Minority Leader again!
          SO THAT’S A REALLY GOOD REASON TO KICK THE DEMOCRATS OUT ON THEIR COLLECTIVE ASSES — so we can be RID of Nancy.

          If, however, the Dems keep control of the House, you’ll see Pelosi running for Speaker again! She might not WIN, because the younger/newer Dems are SO FAR to the left, but it’s a RISK…

          MUCH better to hang onto Republican control even if they’re not all TERRIFIC Republicans, even if our margin is cut.

      • RightWriter

        She’s got a district that is about 80% Democrat, so the chance of her being “fired by some more sensible voters” is remote. The difference between HER district and Maxine Waters’s is that Pelosi’s voters are mostly white (with a lot of Asians) and — surprise! — Waters’s are mostly (like 95%) African-American.

    • LOU

      If she were to expire, she would be doing the whole country a big favor

  • Den Zampieri

    Pelosi is a big zit on the face of America….she needs to pop it and pop out of politics….just another wart in Washington DC.

  • Jodi

    I live in California, I have never voted for Pelosi. She has always been for giving FREEBIES to people who break our laws by coming here ILLEGALLY. The legal American born taxpayers are suppose to pay for all their FREEBIES because they want a better life. She has made statements over the years that we OWE it to them. In reality, they need to make changes in their countries, not rob us. When she speaks in public she acts like she’s on something.

    • Rod

      She’s probably snorting coke or meth.

    • RightWriter

      Well, since California has 53 seats in the House (at present & until after the 2020 Census), living “in California” doesn’t mean you live in Nancy Pelosi’s district — which is mostly San Francisco and a few close-in suburbs. But you’re right about her support for illegal immigrants! :0(

  • Palmer

    Nancy Pelosi is the Dumbist Broad in the Govt. She makes no sense with the Psycho Babbel that comes spitting out of her mouth. “Lets pass the Bill so we can see what’s in it”. That was the Dumbist thing I have ever heard. She needs to go!!!

    • Lawabiding

      She’s the best thing to happen for conservatives, I want her to stay so people can see how dumb progressives are !!!!

      • RightWriter

        I think that way, too. If she retires (she’s NOT gonna LOSE in that San Francisco district of hers), who will we have to KICK AROUND next year? Maxine Waters, sure, but she’s not NEARLY as much fun to beat up on — and she’ll NEVER be in the leadership, no matter what. The OTHER really STUPID Democrats are smart enough to keep their mouths shut and just show off their colorful cowboy hats.

    • RightWriter

      I agree with you about Pelosi’s lack of brains — and especially that now famous “pass the bill so we can see what’s in it…” line. IF the Dems DO NOT take control of the House in November, you can COUNT on Nancy being GONE before the new Congress takes its seats. She doesn’t want to be Minority Leader again! SO THAT’S A REALLY GOOD REASON TO KICK THE DEMOCRATS OUT ON THEIR COLLECTIVE ASSES — so we can be RID of Nancy.
      If, however, the Dems keep control of the House, you’ll see Pelosi running for Speaker again! She might not WIN, because the younger/newer Dems are SO FAR to the left, but it’s a RISK…
      MUCH better to hang onto Republican control even if they’re not all TERRIFIC Republicans, even if our margin is cut.

  • Palmer

    This Bitch wants to make America Brown. I’m for immigration but it has to be the right way. Apply, do the paper work and wait your turn. Period. She cares more about the illegals then she does the US citizens that belong here. It’s all about Votes. Period. Dump her.!!

  • Peter Raymond

    remember what this Ameriphobic ass said – “we have to win in November so illegals will have more leverage”. this ‘thing’ is advocating for the rights of criminal invaders over the rights and safety of citizens.

  • Bryce Thompson

    The only thing that will bring us out of this depression is free energy, hydrogen from water, have this as your debate, you can make all the hydrogen, as you drive from a tank of water, you know our space shuttles,are powered by hydrogen / oxygen made from water, tell every one not buy a new car / truck, to boycott the auto company’s, when they can’t sell their pieces of junk low mileage vehicles, they will have to bring out water to hydrogen powered vehicles, and kits to change the vehicles now that we have, just think what our world would be like with free energy. a Porge vapor carburetor sitting in the patient office that gets around 200 mpg, Volkswagen diesel gets 264 mpg, we are getting ripped off by the oil company owned auto company’s
    Also audit all the Senator’s and representatives, they have wasted, and stole our money, make them repay all, and tax them.
    The democratic government had murdered the inventor of the water to hydrogen auto for the damned oil company’s, get mad get real mad, and boycott, spread the word. just dream of a world with free energy, and it will come soon.

  • desert fox

    Ms.Car Lube lift of the forties…..she was ugly then and she hasn’t changed very much even with the face lifts….she now has hair on her chest and one more and she’ll have a mustache just like killary.