National Security Advisor Is Under Fire For A Curious Reason

National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster is under fire for his recent purge of the National Security Council.

McMaster was accused of purging the NSC due to where the loyalties of the employees laid, no one was questioning their competence.

But new details were just released that paint a new picture– one in which H.R. McMaster may be the villain after all.

More information was just revealed about McMaster’s reasons for letting go three security council members in particular.

McMaster’s ideologies regarding how a department should run are potentially inhibiting free speech, and leading to the unfair termination of employees.

The National Security Advisor was also accused of terminating their employment due to a difference in political views– even though the terminated employees claimed their political views aligned with President Trump.

Breitbart News reported:

All three who were fired were given vague reasons why they were being let go, but they believe it was because they supported the president’s nationalist foreign policy agenda, according to sources close to them who did not feel comfortable speaking on the record. None of the sources have ever worked at Breitbart News.

The first casualty was Rich Higgins, who penned a memo warning that “globalists, bankers, Islamists, and establishment Republicans” were seeking to destroy the president.

On Tuesday, July 18, Higgins was brought into the White House counsel’s office and asked about the memo and what it was for. He was asked, “What if it leaked?” Higgins told the council, “We’re not trying to leak it.” He told them it was so that people from the campaign understood what they were up against.

The same individual was told he was being let go because the council members “lost confidence” in him.

McMaster is also being targeted for his handling of foreign policy– another hot topic surrounding several terminations.

H.R. McMaster has openly sided against Trump when it comes to their views on Islamic radicalism.

While President Trump consistently pushes that the terrorists are inherently linked to the Muslim faith, McMaster claims the two are not one and the same.

Another employee lost his position as a result of his different political views– once again still siding with Trump on the matter.

Breitbart continued:

The source said McMaster fired Harvey because he wanted to support the president’s foreign policy agenda, which McMaster disagreed with “on nearly every” major area, including the Paris Climate Agreement, NAFTA, interventionism, Afghanistan, and whether there is such thing as “radical Islam.”

The source close to Harvey said McMaster believed that the idea of a “radical Islam” was “fallacious” and that terrorists were “just criminals.” McMaster’s attempts to scrub any mention of “radical Islam” from Trump’s speeches has been widely reported.

President Trump has certainly taken notice of the changes in the National Security Council and has even expressed his displeasure with McMaster.

Breitbart continued:

Although Trump has repeatedly stuck up for McMaster, the source said that the president has expressed impatience during meetings.

Asked whether Trump is aware of McMaster’s ideological differences, the source said, “Yes, I think he’s aware. He’s made comments before, like ‘You aren’t listening to me,’ and ‘I told you I’m not going to be doing things the same stupid way that’s been done in the last 18 years.”

In an interview with NBC News on Sunday, McMaster indicated more could be pushed out of the NSC.

Do you think McMaster should still hold his job after he abused his power and terminated Trump-supporters?

Leave us your thoughts in the comments section below.

  • Doni609

    All these generals need to be returned to military where they belong. I wouldn’t trust that old drunkard McMaster with any tidbit related to national security.

  • Dorothy Glasscock

    I absolutely do not. I think he should be dismissed immediately and those terminated should be reinstated. I think he is a traitor to the president and possibly to the country.

  • yankee clipper

    McMaster should have been tossed out on his butt weeks ago.
    Dorothy, hit it right on the head.

  • barbarakelly

    MAKES ME WONDER IF THESE LETTING BANNON GO WAS A WAY TO BRING OUT THE BAGGAGE OF MCMASTER. BECAUSE NOW HE IS IN THE LIMELIGHT. SO THAT WHAT EVER HE DOES WILL BE OUT IN FRONT AND TRUMP CAN WATCH HIM.!! I EVEN WONDER IF TRUMP HAS MCMASTERS PHONE TAPED.TO SEE IF HE IS COMUNICATING WITH SOROS

  • Scott Dillard

    McMaster’s purge of Obama holdovers was long overdue.

  • loseobummer2012

    Why would Donald Trump keep this guy in his position? It seems obvious that he is not interested in the reasons Mr. Trump was elected. It has been reported that there are a multitude of Obummer appointees still hanging onto their positions. To me it sounds like the President is ignoring the very reason there are so many leaked blurbs flooding the airways by the “fake” news outlets. Is it better to have a bunch of bad apples in the basket or is it better to have fewer apples, all of which are good?

    • Munge

      President Trump ordered McMaster to fire all obozo holdovers but instead he fired people loyal to the President so he is definitely an obozo sympathizer. He should’ve been gone weeks ago.

  • David Wayne Ray

    If McMaster is involved in any way aligning himself with the radical rebels who are trying to overthrow our government , not only should he be removed from his position , but locked up & charged with treason.

  • RG ODOM

    it’s time for mc masters to go

  • tb17

    When are the scales going to come off and people see that Islam is NOT a religion but a political entity. They have laws just like the U. S. has laws….and their laws are not compatible with the laws of this country. That is not to say that the people are unacceptable but the LAWS OF ISLAM are not compatible with the US laws and they should make a choice when it comes to deciding between the two laws.

  • tb17

    There still appears to be a number of leakers? Are the Obamaites still employed there with access to all the information still in all security departments that Obama allowed as he was leaving the government.