Hillary Clinton can’t stop perjuring herself.
House Republicans have already documented four instances where Clinton lied under oath.
And she has just committed perjury for a fifth time.
Recently, a federal judge ordered Clinton to answer written questions from the watchdog group Judicial Watch as part of their Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the State Department.
One of the questions pertained to her conversations with IT specialist Brian Pagliano.
Pagliano was the staffer who set up her private server. But he repeatedly took the Fifth Amendment instead of answering questions about his role in her email scandal and received immunity from the FBI.
Clinton claimed in her answers that she did not have any recollection of talking to Pagliano about her server or managing her emails.
One interrogatory sought information about “any communications between [Clinton] and Brian Pagliano concerning or relating to the management . . . of any emails in your clintonemail.com email account.”
Clinton’s response to that interrogatory states, in part, “Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall having communications with Bryan Pagliano concerning or relating to the management . . . of any e-mails in her clintonemail.com email account.”
After receiving Clinton’s sworn response, Judicial Watch received several emails that they say raises questions about Clinton’s response.
For example, one email, from the FBI, appears to show Hillary Clinton (H) reaching out to Pagliano via email to ask for help with programs she was having with her Blackberry email system — which records show was connected to her private server.
“These new emails leave little doubt that Hillary Clinton was less than forthright and misled the public when she wrote, under oath, that she ‘couldn’t recall’ communicating with Bryan Pagliano about her email scheme,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement obtained by LawNewz.com. “No wonder Clinton and her agents deleted these emails time and time again. And these smoking gun emails would never have seen the light of day but for Judicial Watch’s federal lawsuits.”
LawNewz.com also asked Mr. Fitton if Judicial Watch planned to raise the apparent discrepancy in Clinton’s sworn answers to interrogatories and the evidence in the newly uncovered emails next time they are before the Court.
Mr. Fitton did not offer any specifics, except to say, Judicial Watch “continue[s] to evaluate our next steps.”
You can add this lie to the pile of crimes committed by Hillary during her email scandal.
Critics contend an honest Justice Department and FBI would have prosecuted her.
But they have been subverted by Barack Obama to act as arms of the Democrat Party.
When Trump says the system is rigged, he’s referring to the institutions which are supposed to act on behalf of the American people – not selectively enforce the laws to benefit the powerful.
There is no clearer example of this than Hillary Clinton – who escaped all criminal charges for using a private email server to transmit classified intelligence and then repeatedly lied about it under oath.
Do you agree?
Let us know what you think in the comment section.