One Jaw Dropping Secret From Kamala Harris’ Past Could End Her Challenge To Trump

The fake news media promotes Kamala Harris as the strongest Democrat to defeat Donald Trump in 2020.

But Harris is now on thin ice.

That’s because this jaw dropping secret form her past could end her challenge to President Trump.

Before Harris won election to the United States Senate in 2016, she served as Attorney General for the State of California.

This new position is providing fresh fodder for Harris’ opponents to dig through her records and find multiple scandals that show she is lying about being “for the people,” as her campaign slogan suggests.

Harris made her name in the United States Senate attacking Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearing.

The California Democrats latched onto the hoax allegations against Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct to portray herself as a crusader for victimized women.

Her performance helped build a fundraising base that shot her into the stratosphere of Democrat Presidential contenders once she announced her candidacy.

However, there is more going on than meets the eye.

As Attorney General of California, Harris oversaw settlement payments of over one million dollars to victims who claimed they had been sexually harassed or retaliated against for filing a complaint about sexual harassment in the California Department of Justice.

This is not the only sexual harassment scandal on Harris’ watch.

One of her top aides – Larry Wallace – resigned last December after the Sacramento Bee reported on a  $400,000 settlement from his time working with Harris at the California Department of Justice.

A woman claimed Wallace made her perform demeaning tasks such as wearing skin tight clothing and crawling around on the ground.

Harris claimed she had no knowledge of the allegations against Wallace.

“We were unaware of this issue and take accusations of harassment extremely seriously. This evening, Mr. Wallace offered his resignation to the senator and she accepted it,” Harris spokeswoman Lily Adams said in a statement after Wallace’s resignation.

Critics do not believe this answer.

They contend there are only two real explanations.

Either Harris covered up for Wallace because he was a trusted aide.

Or, Harris ran the type of office where women were afraid to speak up about predatory behavior.

Many Americans believe the latter to be the case after an interview where Harris explained her conduct in the matter.

In a recent interview with Univision, Harris also revealed she had not spoken with the victim.

“I have indicated that I am supportive of all women who come forward and speak up and have the courage to speak up,” Harris told Univision’s Ilia Calderon. “In this specific case I have not talked to the victim.”

Harris’ heartless response reminded many Americans of Hillary Clinton being asked that since all women should be believed, then why did she dismiss the credible accusations made by women against Bill Clinton?

In today’s Democrat Party, unless you are a 100 percent ally of “marginalized” groups, the party base will treat you with suspicion and score.

And this could open up running room for one of Harris’ rivals.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *