The “First Man” In A Clinton Election

In a nightmare scenario where Hillary Clinton is elected President of the United States, Bill Clinton would hold the role of the United States of America’s “First Man.”

Bill Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States, who sullied the office of the highest executive in the land by having an affair, then lying about it — and costing the taxpayers $70 million between the shady Whitewater business venture and the Monica Lewinsky scandal — would be back in the White House.

The well-known “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” liar with weak morals and ethics would be in his old stomping grounds once again.

As a sidelight, wife Hillary Clinton, who claims to be a rabid supporter of women’s rights, knew of his escapades, accusations of sexual harassment, and in one instance an accusation of rape, and didn’t say one word about how his immoral actions were an all-out assault on women everywhere.

In continuation of the Clintons’ shadiness, there are now questions regarding the unethical business practices at the Clinton Foundation, and questions continue to surround the source of Bill Clinton’s extravagant speaking fees for fundraising events.

The Clinton Foundation was created to address issues of “global importance,” and it has been used to advance the global warming hoax, control food choice in schools, advance “renewable” (higher cost) energy sources, and other unsavory liberal causes.

It has reportedly also been used to cover Bill Clinton’s legal fees generated by the Whitewater scandal, his proven affair with Monica Lewinsky, and his reported affair with Paula Jones.

In 2006, the Clinton Foundation spent $12.6 million on Bill Clinton’s 60th birthday party, and recorded the cost as “fundraising expenses.”

Questions abound regarding the fact that for years, only one or two of Bill Clinton’s closest friends were allowed to serve on the Board of Directors.  Most non-profit organizations have large boards that keep the activities of the organization “honest.”  It is a sign of a healthy organization and is considered to be ethical practice.

But not the Clinton Foundation.

As far as the fundraising lecture fees Bill Clinton has collected over the years, a recent review by the Washington Free Beacon found that Hillary Clinton often listed small foreign speaking firms as the source of Bill Clinton’s lecture payments in her Senate and State Department disclosures, even though the actual payment for the lectures came from undisclosed third parties.

Hiding the source of the payments is troubling from a transparency perspective. The Free Beacon found that at least 30 funders for his speeches remain a mystery.

In one case, Bill Clinton spoke to a crowd at a Hilton Hotel in London in 2009 for a whopping $290,000 speaking fee.  Hillary Clinton listed “World Management Limited” as the company responsible for payment of the fee in her federal financial filings.

However, it was discovered that the fee was paid by a wealthy British businessman named Robert Whitton — a name not found in the Clintons’ public disclosure forms.

These examples of unethical business practices and shady dealings don’t even scratch the surface.

In the nightmare with Hillary Clinton as President and Bill Clinton as the “First Man” of the United States, there would surely be many more ethical and moral violations.

The U.S. would do well to have an honorable gentlemen as its “First Man.”

And Bill Clinton doesn’t fit the bill.

  • Evy

    Billy has the morals of a goat and now he’s an old goat. One thing about Billy and his She Devil wife is they’ve been dishonest their whole life and they will die dishonest. In time they will be begging for a cold glass of water.

    • Eleanor Cummings

      When Clinton gets to hell, she’ll learn many things, such as she can’t take her ill-gotten gains with her, what the Muslims that she espouses are really about and she’ll definitely learn firsthand what Sharia law is! She’ll meet Margaret Sanger of Planned Parenthood there and also Robert Byrd of the KKK, and along with them, she’ll have to account for the loss of unborn lives because of her black genocide views and also both black and white lives due to her views on the killing of blacks by the KKK. And what about all the “unexplained ” and “untimely” deaths of people who went against her?? Oh, yes, Satan is reserving a special spot in hell for her and Slick Willie both!!

      • Evy

        Greetings Eleanor. I totally agree with everything you said here. Zuckerberg is still a child who has much to learn about our 1st and 2nd amendments. I’m betting he has no idea what those amendments mean. One thing about these brain dead liberals they claim they know what’s good for the rest of us. Soon Trump will be telling them what’s good for them. Go, Trump! .

        • Eleanor Cummings

          I guess he feels big and great because he was able to block 3 woman (so far) from Facebook for posting conservative articles in opposition to his liberal ideas. I wonder, how would he have amassed all that wealth if he lived in a socialist country rather than a capitalistic country? He’s not very smart except for the website he built. Someday someone who knows how will realize the potential of creating another website similar to Facebook – one where people can express their views even if they don’t agree with his. And Mark must be proud that he can keep an 81 year old disabled widow from using his site. Good going, big boss man Mark Zuckerberg!! Come on Trump all the way to the White House.

  • Lawrence

    He will not be the “First Man.” He will be the “First Crime Boss.”

  • Eleanor Cummings

    I can’t share this with my friends on Facebook. Facebook won’t let me. And since I’ve been posing this letter, two other people have contacted me about the same problem. Whatever happened to our 1st Amendment where Zuckerberg is concerned? I STLL SUPPORT THE 1ST AND 2ND AMENDMENTS, ZUCKERBERG!!

    This is the second time you’ve blocked me from my account. I am an 81 year old disabled widow lady who uses a computer daily to do research on everything from politics to cooking, plus keeping up with my family who live far from me. The first time, you blocked me for 30 days – NO EXPLANATION. I figured it was either because of my assessment of Frankie the pope, or what I found out about Cruz and posted. I am a proud republican, and never race bait, I support law enforcement, also the1st and 2nd amendments, never use foul language, etc, but you’ve “boycotted” me again, I guess, but this time you say I have Malware on my computer and sent me this.

    Your Computer Needs to Be Cleaned

    It looks like your computer is being affected by malware. We’ll help you fix the problem to keep your account secure and prevent malware from spreading to friends.

    Malware is software that tries to steal personal information and causes problems when you use Facebook. Clicking or sharing links that contain spam can give your computer malware.

    Get Started
    I have Bitdefender Total Security 2016, so I scanned my computer – twice! Both times tested clean. Bitdefender Total Security 2016 lets their customers know when NOT to open a program by showing a big red page so that you can click back to safety. You never open those pages. Plus I had a computer man heck my computer, and has HouseCall scan it – all say my computer is clean!!
    And it’s next to impossible to contact Facebook. If you post to customer service, they tell you to reset your password, which they disallow by kicking you back into Malware warning. In other words, you go around in a circle. This is just one file.
    But I AM accessing many other sites, as long as the site isn’t linked to FB. . Please check your own program now. Do I send my bill to you direct for the cost of the computer man?? It IS your mistake, not mine. Now that I have proved there is no Malware on my computer, WHAT EXCUSE WILL YOU USE TO DENY ME ACCESS TO MY ACCOUNT??
    All the information that I’ve dug up pertinent to this election I’ve been posting on my FB Timeline, along with source and links so everyone can check out the facts for themselves. Lots of stuff on Clintons, Obama’s, the Bush family etc. Someone must have taken exception to some of my postings, maybe? But I can still post on other sites, no problems, as long as they don’t link back to FB. Perhaps, if I post this problem on a lot of other sites I frequent, you’ll get the message and get back to me, since you reroute every attempt to contact you direct? (A copy of this letter has been posted to my files)