The attempt to cover up the origins of the coronavirus outbreak has been destroyed.
There’s no getting away from the truth of the situation now.
A damning piece of evidence is the last thing Dr. Fauci wanted to see.
The National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is led by Dr. Fauci, gave the Wuhan Institute of Virology$3.7 million, 5-year project for collecting and studying bat coronaviruses which ended in 2019.
The project included work on gain-of-function research according to Newsweek story published in April 2020.
The theory that the coronavirus leaked from a Chinese Lab was accepted by May 2020 by the majority of the U.S. Intelligence Community and yet information on the subject was silenced by big tech and the mainstream media.
It seems likely that their motivation in crushing any discussion of covid’s origin was caused by their desire to protect Fauci, from the scandal that he potentially helpedfund the creation of a virus that’s killed millions worldwide.
Dr. Steven Quay and UC Berkeley emeritus professor of physics Richard Muller said that there is “damning” evidence suggesting that COVID-19 was altered in a laboratory.
They explained that in gain-of-function research a specific protein is altered to make a virus more transmissible or lethal.
The DNA sequence, CGG-CGG which is found in covid they said, has “never been found naturally” in “the entire class of coronaviruses that includes CoV-2.”
“Although the double CGG is suppressed naturally, the opposite is true in laboratory work. The insertion sequence of choice is the double CGG. That’s because it is readily available and convenient, and scientists have a great deal of experience inserting it. An additional advantage of the double CGG sequence compared with the other 35 possible choices: It creates a useful beacon that permits the scientists to track the insertion in the laboratory.” The two wrote.
The coronavirus has a DNA that isn’t found in coronavirus and rarely mutates naturally but is commonly inserted in laboratory research.
“Proponents of zoonotic origin must explain why the novel coronavirus, when it mutated or recombined, happened to pick its least favorite combination, the double CGG. Why did it replicate the choice the lab’s gain-of-function researchers would have made?” The authors stated.
It is also suspicious that a paper in February 2020, Chinese scientists failed to mention this important segment within the coronavirus.
Quay and Muller also discuss how unusual it is for a virus in such a highly contagious form. Normally it takes time for a virus to adapt as it spreads through the population, but they explain, “Covid-19 didn’t work that way. It appeared in humans already adapted into an extremely contagious version. No serious viral “improvement” took place until a minor variation occurred many months later in England.”
“Such early optimization is unprecedented, and it suggests a long period of adaptation that predated its public spread. Science knows of only one way that could be achieved: simulated natural evolution, growing the virus on human cells until the optimum is achieved. That is precisely what is done in gain-of-function research.”
If you want Conservative Revival to keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story and the rest of the breaking news in politics please bookmark our site, consider making us your homepage and forward our content with your friends on social media and email.