Democrats aren’t willing to stand by a certified and decided election.
They’re working to undermine election integrity.
Nancy Pelosi said four shocking words to justify Democrats stealing an election.
Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signaled her support of Democrats launching an investigation into the election of Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA) that could result in her being unseated by her Democrat rival Rita Hart.
While the election between Miller-Meeks and Hart was extremely close, Hart decided not to pursue legal measures in the court. Instead she’s looking for Congress to help her unseat her opponent.
Pelosi said on Sunday to ABC News host George Stephanopoulos that the probe was justified because “it was six votes” separating the two candidates.
“I want to ask you about the controversy around the Iowa’s second congressional district. The GOP Congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks won a razor close election, six votes. The votes were counted, recounted, certified by the state. But the House Administration Committee began a process this week that could lead to unseating the congresswoman.” Stephanopoulos asked.
Pelosi agreed that that the statement was correct.
“That has Republicans accusing you of hypocrisy, including Jim Jordan. He put out this tweet: Speaker Pelosi says she’s open to unseating Republican Congresswoman Miller-Meeks. Translation, you’re only allowed to object to an election if you’re a Democrat. Why investigate an election that was certified by the state?” Stephanopoulos commented.
“Well, it was six votes. It was six votes, and our candidate Rita Hart, the Democratic candidate asked for this process to begin. What the committee did, the House Administration Committee, was very narrow to take the process to the next step and see where it goes from there. An election of six votes out of 400,000 votes cast. This is not unique. This has happened, maybe even when you were in the Capitol before when races had been close one side or the others saying, let’s take it to the House. Because even Justice Scalia agreed that the House has the authority to seat members, and therefore we can count the votes. Six votes out of 400,000 cast. For them to call anybody hypocritical about elections when two-thirds of them in the House voted against accepting the presidency of Joe Biden is — well, it’s just who they are.” Pelosi commented.
It doesn’t matter what the margin of victory was. The election has already been decided. It the election was unfair then Hart could have contested the case in court but she decided not to go that route.
If there was election fraud that changed the outcome of the election why didn’t Hart try to fight the case in court?
The fact that Hart was unwilling to take the case to court shows that there’s no good evidence for overturning the election, it’s a power move by Democrats who think the rules don’t apply to them.
If you want Conservative Revival to keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story and the rest of the breaking news in politics please bookmark our site, consider making us your homepage and forward our content with your friends on social media and email.