Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats are using the courts to advance their stealth agenda to impeach President Donald Trump.
And they are counting on one court case as the crown jewel of their scheme to remove President Trump from office.
And now this judge just made a decision that left Nancy Pelosi having no idea what hit her.
Having struck out in the Southern District of New York and with Robert Mueller’s Congressional testimony, Democrats were left scrambling to pick up the pieces.
Democrats settled on fighting to get their hands on Donald Trump’s tax returns as the silver bullet to end the Trump Presidency.
Anti-Trump Democrats took two shots at the President’s tax returns.
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal invoked a rarely used 1920s law to force the IRS Commissioner to hand over Donald Trump’s tax returns to Neal’s committee.
In addition, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed legislation allowing Congress to request the President’s New York State tax returns.
President Trump’s lawyers sued to stop both attempts by Democrats to claw back the President’s tax returns.
The President’s legal team claimed the Democrats had no legitimate legislative basis to demand the President’s tax returns.
Governor Cuomo’s legislation allowing Congress to demand the President’s state tax returns complicates the request for the President’s tax returns.
The President’s lawyers argued that Chairman Neal and the House Democrats are claiming they need the President’s tax returns because they need to ensure the IRS audits of current Presidents are being carried out fairly and without favor.
But if that is the case, why do they need the President’s state tax returns?
Those returns will not show if the IRS is treating the President’s audit as they would any other tax payer.
President Trump’s lawyers argued that the Democrats’ sole purpose for requesting Donald Trump’s tax returns is to dig up anything they can portray as politically embarrassing and leak it to the public to build momentum behind impeachment.
Democrats made use of the New York law to get Trump’s state returns because they want leak the President’s tax returns as quickly as possible.
The judge presiding over the Trump legal team’s lawsuit to block New York state from turning over the President’s state tax returns seemed to agree.
Washington, D.C. federal judge Carl Nichols hinted in court that he was inclined to issue a ruling blocking the state of New York from turning over the President’s state tax returns while the legal fight played out.
Democrats used to be able to count on easy victories in Washington, D.C. federal courts because Barack Obama stacked the bench with left-wing political activists during his eight years in office.
But Judge Nichols is a Trump appointee.
And the President’s commitment to a sweeping remaking of the federal judiciary by working with Senate Republicans to confirm a record number of federal judges that will interpret the Constitution as the Founders intended is beginning to pay off.
Conservative Revival will continue to follow any new developments in this ongoing court case.