With three weeks to go in the Presidential campaign Joe Biden is staring at the biggest crisis of his campaign.
It’s all because of the New York Post.
This criminal cover up just exploded In Joe Biden’s face because of one email.
The New York Post published a bombshell story revealing emails from Hunter Biden and top ranking executive at the corrupt Ukrainian energy company Burisma in 2014 and 2015 after Burisma added Hunter Biden to its Board of Directors.
In the Post’s story they published emails that critics contend showed Hunter Biden and Bursima were engaged in a clear cut pay for play scheme to leverage Hunter Biden’s relationship with his father Vice President Joe Biden.
The emails showed a company executive thanking Hunter Biden for setting up a meeting with Joe Biden undercutting Joe Biden’s claim he never discussed his son’s foreign business dealings with him.
Biden’s allies understood how damaging the story was and acted appropriately.
Twitter censored the story by locking the account of the New York Post and White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany for sharing the article.
Users could not tweet out the article or send it via direct messages.
It was the type of censorship seen in Hollywood movies that tell alternate histories where Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union emerged victorious over the United States.
Twitter later tried to explain away their censorship claiming the Post’s story violated the platform’s policy on publishing personal information.
“The images contained in the articles include personal and private information — like email addresses and phone numbers — which violate our rules,” Twitter Safety posted.
Twitter doubled down on this laughable explanation claiming the Post’s story violated the platforms rules against sharing content that was obtained from hacks or in an unauthorized manner
“As noted this morning, we also currently view materials included in the articles as violations of our Hacked Materials Policy…
… The policy, established in 2018, prohibits the use of our service to distribute content obtained without authorization. We don’t want to incentivize hacking by allowing Twitter to be used as distribution for possibly illegally obtained materials,” Twitter Safety added.
This was also clearly a lie.
Twitter never censored articles from the New York Times that were based on personal tax returns from Donald Trump that were illegally obtained.
But Twitter was not the only social media company to suppress the story.
Andy Stone – a former staffer for Democrat Senator Barbara Boxer and the Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee – and a communications executive at Facebook bragged on social media that Facebook censored the story by not allowing users to distribute the story to their friends news feeds.
“While I will intentionally not link to the New York Post, I want be clear that this story is eligible to be fact checked by Facebook’s third-party fact checking partners. In the meantime, we are reducing its distribution on our platform,” Stone wrote.
In China the communist government decides what citizens are allowed to post online.
Twitter and Facebook proved today that they possess terrifying power equal to the most evil and authoritarian governments on the planet.
And it is leading to calls to reform the special privileges granted under Section 230 of the Communications and Decency Act that grants platforms immunity for liability os long as they are neutral content providers.
Twitter and Facebook are not neutral platforms.
They are the largest and most powerful publishers on the face of the planet.
If you want Conservative Revival to keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story and the rest of the breaking news in politics please bookmark our site, consider making us your homepage and forward our content with your friends on social media and email.